Exclusive Licensing
What Does "Under Exclusive License To" Mean in Music? How to Read the ℗ Line on a Release
By the Starchild Music team · November 11, 2026 · 6 min read

The short answer
It means the company named after "to" holds the exclusive right to release that recording, while the party named before it still owns the recording. The ℗ marks a notice for a sound recording, and the year is when it was first published. The line does not say who wrote the song, how long the deal lasts or where it applies.
Near the bottom of an album page you may see a line like this: ℗ 2026 Artist Name under exclusive license to Label Name. In plain words, Label Name has been given the sole right to release that recording, usually for a set time and place. It has not bought the recording. Artist Name, the party named first, still owns it.
The line reads like a warning, but it is really a short map of who holds which rights. This guide reads it piece by piece, explains why labels write it this way and shows what to do with it.
Read the line one piece at a time
Take the example line and split it up. The pattern is owner first, licensee second.
- ℗ is the symbol for a sound recording. The U.S. Copyright Office says a notice for a recording uses ℗ in place of ©. The P stands for phonograph, an old word for a sound recording, as the Arts Law Centre of Australia explains.
- 2026 is the year of first publication, the year the recording was first released to the public.
- Artist Name is the owner of the copyright in the recording. It might be the artist, a producer, a small label or the artist's own company.
- "Under exclusive license to" says the owner has licensed the recording, not sold it.
- Label Name is the exclusive licensee: the company that releases and runs the recording under that license.
What an exclusive license of a recording means
A master license, in the words of the Arts Law Centre's fact sheet, is a contract that lets others "use and commercially exploit a master recording, without giving up copyright ownership." The master is the finished recording. Exclusive means the owner will not give the same rights to anyone else in that territory for the term. The same fact sheet adds that an owner who grants an exclusive, worldwide license can no longer use the recording themselves unless the contract leaves room for it.
U.S. law treats an exclusive license as a real transfer of rights. The Copyright Act counts it as a "transfer of copyright ownership" of the rights it covers, so it has to be in writing and signed by the owner. The Copyright Alliance puts it this way: an exclusive licensee "is considered to be the owner of those rights." Everything the license does not cover stays with the first owner.
Why labels write it this way
The wording appears when the company that releases a recording is not the one that owns it. The Arts Law fact sheet says a master license can sit between an artist and an independent company, between an independent company and a major label, or between a major label and its affiliate in another country.
Territory is a common reason. Labels and artists license recordings abroad because they lack the money or the contacts to sell them there, and two licensees cannot both be exclusive in one territory. So the company named on one country's release may not be the one named on another's.
Licenses also end. Arts Law says that when the term expires, the rights revert to the owner, who can negotiate new terms or license someone else. The label in the line today may not be the label in it five years from now.
And it is a custom, not a rule. In the U.S., a copyright notice is optional for works published on or after March 1, 1989, and the Copyright Office says owners can use any form of notice they wish, though a notice may need to follow the standard form to block an "innocent infringement" defense. The standard form is the three parts above: the symbol, the year and the owner's name. The words "under exclusive license to" are an addition around them.
Naming a licensee is not a new idea, though. The 1971 international convention on phonograms, which describes the same ℗ notice, says that if the copies do not otherwise identify the producer, its successor in title or its exclusive licensee, the notice should include the name of one of them.
What the line does not tell you
- Who wrote the song. ℗ covers the recording. The writers appear in the song credits and in databases, as our guides to finding the songwriter and publisher and to finding out who owns a song show.
- What the © line beside it covers. Distributors describe it differently: RouteNote's help center says it is for the composition, and Record Union's says it is for the artwork and track order. Do not use it to find the writers.
- How long the license lasts or where it applies. Those terms sit in the contract, not on the sleeve.
- Whether the artist is signed for more than this release. A recording license can cover one release or many. A separate promise, such as an artist agreeing to record only for one label, is another kind of exclusive. Sound On Sound describes it as a contract under which the artist cannot record for another label without permission.
- That the line is right. Notices are optional, and the Copyright Office says owners can word them as they like. The Office says a notice identifies the owner at first publication for people seeking permission, so treat it as a lead and confirm with the label.
- That every service shows it the same way. One distributor's help page tells artists to enter only the label's name in the field and lists "under exclusive licence to" as an incorrect entry. The wording can differ from one service to the next.
What to do with what you read
Start with what you want to do.
- Record your own version of the song. You need permission for the song, not for the label's recording. A mechanical license is the usual route, as mechanical licenses, explained shows.
- Use the recording itself, as a sample, a clip in a video or a scene in a film. Ask whoever controls it. Start with the label named after "to", since it runs the release, and ask who must approve. Arts Law notes that a licensee's contract may let it grant some uses only for requests that come from inside its own territory, so the owner, the licensee or both may need to say yes.
If you release your own recording of a licensed song
Your line is simpler. You made the recording, so the owner is usually you: ℗ 2026 Your Name. The exclusive license you hold from a songwriter is a license for the song, and it does not belong in a ℗ line. You would write "under exclusive license to" only if you had licensed your own recording to a label.
On Starchild, an exclusive takes a song off the market for 3, 6 or 12 months, and whoever listed the song keeps its copyright. That is a deal about the song and its writers, which is a different thing from a label's license of a recording. Our guide to whether an exclusive license means you own the song explains the difference.
A short example
Priya records an EP at her own expense, so she owns the recordings. A small label, Harbor Lane Records, agrees to release it in Europe for five years under an exclusive master license. The European release carries the line ℗ 2027 Priya under exclusive license to Harbor Lane Records. In the U.S., where Harbor Lane has no rights, Priya releases the EP herself, and her line reads ℗ 2027 Priya. It is one recording and one owner, with two lines. When the five years end, the European rights go back to Priya unless they agree to renew.
Priya and Harbor Lane Records are made up, but the structure follows the sources below.
This is general information, not legal advice. If a decision depends on who controls a recording, ask the rights holder, and ask a music attorney before you sign anything. If you are looking for a song to record and release under your own ℗ line, you can browse songs for artists and hear each one in different styles before you license.
Sources
- U.S. Copyright Office: Title 17, Chapter 4, Copyright Notice, Deposit, and Registration (Section 402)
- U.S. Copyright Office: Title 17, Chapter 1, Subject Matter and Scope of Copyright (Section 101, definitions)
- U.S. Copyright Office: Title 17, Chapter 2, Copyright Ownership and Transfer (Sections 201 and 204)
- U.S. Copyright Office: Circular 3, Copyright Notice
- WIPO Lex: Convention for the Protection of Producers of Phonograms Against Unauthorized Duplication of Their Phonograms (1971), Article 5
- Arts Law Centre of Australia: Master Recording Licence Fact Sheet
- Copyright Alliance: Exclusive vs. Non-Exclusive Licenses
- RouteNote Support: Learn your lines to get them right on the night (C line and P line)
- Record Union Help: Adding copyright information
- Sound On Sound: Recording Contracts Explained
Find a song to license
Every song on Starchild can be heard in different styles and in your key before you license it.